This story comes to us from The Daily Mail;
Militants behind the British Airways strike have a secret agenda to take control of the Labour Party, the Daily Mail can reveal.
The hard-Left clique which runs the giant Unite union plans to 'reclaim or refound' Labour, dumping Blairite policies in favour of old-style socialism.
They believe that, because Labour needs union cash to stay afloat, Unite can control its political direction.
The plot is revealed in a series of astonishing emails from Graham Stevenson, a senior Unite official who is also on the executive of the British Communist Party.
Crucially, they show Unite is taking 'strategic' direction from the communists on both the BA strike and the overthrow of New Labour.
One email proclaims: 'The Labour Party is simply broke. As millionaires desert, it has been forced to go back to the unions for funding. We will have a huge number of MPs who are members [of Unite].
'In the past unions had large parliamentary groups but few MPs actually bothered to take account of our policies. This will change!'
Since Gordon Brown became leader, Unite has given Labour £11million - 25 per cent of its income - and saved it from bankruptcy. Unite is funding 148 Labour seats at the General election at a cost of £460,000.
Thirteen members of the Cabinet - half of the total and including Mr Brown - have received a total of £33,000 from the union. Some 167 Labour MPs and candidates are members of Unite, prompting accusations from the Tories that Mr Brown is in danger of relinquishing power to a 'militant tendency'.
As national organiser of the transport section of Unite, Mr Stevenson is a central figure in the union, alongside the equally Left-wing assistant general secretary Len McCluskey who is personally co-ordinating the BA strikes.
The Stevenson emails, sent over the past 12 days to London-based political historian Pavel Stroilov who is writing a book about Labour's links with Communism, show that after the next election Unite plans to exert 'vigorous control' over its sponsored MPs.
Mr Stevenson says: 'Unions will have to make a judgment decision about Labour - whether to give up on the reclaiming approach or simply refound it.'
He makes clear his support for Mr McCluskey in the contest for the leadership of Unite - the most powerful post in British trade unionism - which will be held later this year.
Mr McCluskey, who is tipped to win, has promised: 'I will set out a clear strategy designed to reconstruct the Labour Party so that it speaks with our voice and is committed to our values.'
Unite's determination to achieve this is shown in the emails. One from the seasoned communist Mr Stevenson - noting that the Prime Minister stayed silent for three days in the run-up to the BA strike - says cheerfully:'
'Left-leaning union officials once thought that getting Gordon Brown's ear was useful. It's now going way beyond that - more akin to "do they have a chance of getting our ear?".'
The extraordinary correspondence began on March 12 with a routine question from Mr Stroilov to Mr Stevenson about his personal website, which gives a history of the Communist Party in this country.
Mr Stroilov asked: 'How is the class struggle going? Observing it from some distance, it looks like the spectre of Communism is rising again in the British Labour Movement, isn't it?'
This unleashed a flurry of emails from the Unite official, who wrote: 'Yes, things are very busy - the struggle goes on! And yes, the [ Communist] Party is very much in the thick of a great deal.'
I want, no, I demand that my readers understand the significance of this activity. I will not call it a revelation for it is anything but; what was at one time a pair of conjoined twins, Marxists and the Labour Party, are now one and the same. There has never been a shred of doubt that these activities have long been in the making; the 1960s simply solidified and strengthened what was once an obscure political ideology in western Europe.(of course with the exception of the apathetic Spaniards) The lesson to be learned here is that the Marxists are beginning to shed their secrecy and move towards outright belligerence and arrogance that their ideology is what’s best for the people whether those people like it or not. The left has seen the pinnacle of its efforts to sell "utopia" and "social justice" pass by without the success they envisioned, and have resorted to voter cultivation and union terrorism to produce what their manipulation and appeals to compassion have failed to achieve. They are simply no longer interested in what the white British family wants, feels, or have the potential to be; the white British family is now a threat and a detriment to Marxist goals for the future state. When one fails to vote as commanded, then social engineering through mass immigration and a total breakdown of morality through creating apathetic dependence shall compel a "new" British voter to simply vote for what will keep them alive and free of any responsibility whatsoever. This, according to their plan, creates an unopposed mandate for generations to come. That, my friends, is the evil which we must eradicate with the coldest and most brutal determination if we are to survive.
I would also ask that my American readers take notice of these extraordinary times and try to draw parallels to their own demise currently in progress. The initial step was to create a two pronged attack; the first would be to effectively destroy one sixth of the economy, the private sector, and nationalize it. The second would be to create the ultimate dependency of the people to their well informed and all powerful dear leader. There can be no greater power over the people than the decision of who lives and who dies. "Vote for them and you shall lose your tit from which you suckle for your very existence" they will say. Meanwhile by eradicating such a major swath of the private sector, they can begin to scoop up the newly unemployed by putting them on the government payroll; no one would vote against the hand that feeds. The next and most obvious step would be amnesty for 20 to 30 odd million illegals. That would most assuredly cement electoral victory for any major election as well as the imminent motion to suspend democracy indefinitely as it would be for the "good of the people" not to disrupt the progress of the nation. As we all know, "partisan squabbling" is the main obstacle to providing for the welfare of the people. In the meantime, there will be many calls to disarm America as a priority of compassion. Everyone knows how closing gun shops would significantly reduce crime correct? At any rate, an unarmed populace is a defanged and docile one. Peculiar how all these events seem to be coming from the same open sewer of a political party and happening all around the same time isn't it? I shall leave you to draw your own conclusions as you are in no need of someone to think for you. (Komrade hussein frowns upon such liberties; such as thinking for one's self.)
I am left with the conclusion that there must be a deadline; a line drawn in the sand to mark where our dedication to a political solution transforms into alternative methods, in order to deal with those who have no respect or interest in the political process themselves. For Great Britain, the answer is quite simple. The Conservatives shall have one chance and one chance only to restore the nation to where it once was and should always have been. The minute they waver, the second they lean towards the status quo of tossing bones at voters instead of taking the interest of the nation as a whole to heart, they must be shoved aside. If, G-d forbid, Labour engineers a second mandate, then the answer is utter revolt. No matter what happens in May , we the people must meet these unions in the streets and we must crush them; with brute force if necessary. It is no secret that they have an agenda to destroy the private sector and take the reins of power through creating mass chaos. That is clearly what can be defined as a clear and present danger to British national security. To smash the union is to smash Labour and the Marxist cancer in total. That, my friends, is and must remain our top priority for the short term. The attempt at the closure of borders and the ousting of criminal and illegal foreigners will solve nothing so long as the gate keeper remains just another red sympathizer. Always remember the enemy, the true enemy, and meet him head on. The cancer can only be cut out at the root. It is clearly obvious that with no benefactor or "sympathetic" sponsor, the migrant criminal, the muslim, the morally depraved, will have little choice other than to correct their deviant ways or leave.
Comments